fairness, quality, freedom
Posted | 09 Nov 2009
Categories | Free software magazine
From the full post:
A couple of stories have hit the headlines this year concerning the huge cost that some UK Local Governments incurred when dealing with malware attack on their Windows machines. . . .Some in the industry tweeted and blogged this as being a “hidden cost of using Microsoft Windows”. In the ensuing discussion, many pointed out that the high cost was really due to the lack of a proper patching and disaster recovery policy at the council. So which is right? Is dealing with malware a hidden cost of using Windows or of a poor IT strategy?
Link to full post: http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/columns/microsoft_hidden_malware_costs_windows_7